This website uses Cookies
Privacy Policy | Close
Members' Area
Login
Register
My initial view on the EU referendum
Ever since David Cameron announced that there will be a referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union, there have been plenty of dramatic headlines and waves of claim and counter-claim.
The United Kingdom Independence Party and others claim that the EU costs £55 million a day (or £20 billion a year). But this “gross contribution” figure is somewhat greater than the Treasury’s own figures. It also neglects to reference the “UK” rebate or other monies that come back into this country.

The Treasury states that, for 2015/2016, the “net contribution” to the EU will actually be £8.5 billion.

I have also seen figures from the European Commission, which notes additional monies paid direct to the private sector such as research grants. This reduces the “net contribution” to be less than £7 billion.

One campaign organisation Leave.EU has meanwhile claimed that the “average household could be £933 better off if the UK left the EU.” But Britain Stronger in Europe have countered with the argument that “trade, investment, jobs and lower prices” linked to membership of the EU is “worth £3,000 per year to every household.” Others have challenged the reliability of both figures!

Is it any wonder so many people are perplexed by the whole debate? I would certainly appeal to everyone involved in the referendum campaign to reduce the “spin” and to “inform” and keep the arguments as balanced as possible.

From my perspective, I have always been instinctively supportive of the concept of the EU and I will be voting to remain.

I recognise that many positive initiatives have come out of European co-operation such as improved environmental controls and a host of protections for workers.

It is also the case that since Cornwall was recognised as a European region, it has secured significant and much-needed investment through EU structural funds.

Cornwall has been a net beneficiary of EU funding, an important investment for many local businesses – large and small – and for numerous key projects such as the university and superfast broadband.

But much of the debate so far has, inevitably, been dominated by Westminster politicians, the City of London, key participants in the various campaign groups, and peripheral concerns such as the future leadership of the Conservative Party.

Whatever your view on the referendum, I believe it is essential that we do our utmost to ensure that the significance of the issue for Cornwall (and similar areas) is also at the very heart of the debate.
Information, Tags and Sharing
By Dick Cole. Published on 1st March 2016.

Popular Blog Posts
The Cornish Guardian has, on numerous occasions, reported on the parliamentary boundary review, through which the Conservative Government is seeking to reduce the number of MPs to 600 and redraw the political map of the United Kingdom. Here in Cornwall, there has been massive opposition to the changes which would breach the territorial integrity of our Celtic land and lead to the creation of an unpopular cross-Tamar Devonwall seat.
Published: 21st January 2018
Read More...
Last winter, the Royal College of Emergency Medicine publicised its concerns that “emergency care in the NHS” was at “crisis point.” At the same time, the Chief Executive of the British Red Cross claimed that the NHS was facing a “humanitarian crisis.”
Published: 21st January 2018
Read More...
Bernard Jenkin, the Chairman of the Public Administration Committee, is calling on MPs “to decide at the earliest opportunity whether to cut the size of the Commons …”
Published: 5th March 2018
Read More...